AI · Sep 2, 2026
Researchers fear safety disaster ahead of OpenAI’s Astra releaseMicrosoft exec called AI scraping ‘the largest theft of labor in human history,’ new unredacted filings reveal
Analysis of reporting by TechCrunch. How we work

TechCrunch’s unredacted-filing read adds scale: 91,000+ mid-training copies of plaintiff works, 2M+ nytimes.com Common Crawl docs, Project Mango’s 160,903 unique publisher works, and Brockman’s “gazillions” motivation line.
Why it matters
Same lawsuit week, sharper inventory. The Times brief—quoting still-sealed exhibits—puts numbers on the scrape.
Hecht’s January 2023 memo: largest theft of labor in human history. Copilot answer-engine CTR for NYT down as much as 93% versus Bing search. Nadella says he’d have forced a retrain if he’d known OpenAI trained on paywalled material. Mid-training sets alone hold more than 91,692 copies of Times, Daily News, and CIR works.
Trump administration briefing for unlicensed training sits awkwardly next to defendants’ own substitution talk.
From the desk
We’re stacking this TechCrunch pass with the Ars account because the counts change the texture of the fight.
Project Taxi and Project Mango data swaps, WebText’s news-heavy tilt, copyright-notice stripping so models wouldn’t spit notices back—these are process choices, not accidents. Ryder-to-Brockman paywall hack banter remains the character exhibit. Hecht’s doom-loop deck warned the product threatens its own suppliers; Turley called chatbots largely substitutive, period.
Caveat the story itself flags: much arrives via the Times brief, not public exhibits. Still, the quoted lines cut against market-harm prongs of fair use after months of judicial sympathy for trainers—and after the administration’s brief backing OpenAI.
Useful models trained on a dead press aren’t a win. I’m watching whether these figures force settlement math before a jury ever sees the cartoons Microsoft put in its own doom-loop slides.
Context
TechCrunch, September 17, 2026. Companion reporting on the same unsealed NYT v. OpenAI/Microsoft materials covered by Ars.
Who feels it
- Litigators and judges
- Quantitative scrape inventories and CTR deltas become central fair-use exhibits.
- Newsrooms
- Stronger public proof that AI firms modeled publisher harm internally while shipping substitutive products.
- Investors
- Licensing or adverse judgments could reprice training-data risk across the sector.
What to watch
- Unsealing of underlying exhibits beyond the brief’s quotations.
- OpenAI/Microsoft formal responses if they break silence.
- Parallel suits citing these admissions.
More on OpenAI
AI · Sep 22, 2026
Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5 with stricter safeguards for cybersecurityAI · Sep 3, 2026
One bad morning for ChatGPT, Claude, Grok and Gemini shows how fragile everyday AI has becomeAI · Sep 30, 2026
Here’s how tech leaders will self-police AI safety under Trump’s dealAI · Sep 29, 2026
AI researchers put out videos saying superintelligence is ‘exactly as dangerous as it sounds’